bicycle_standard
をテンプレートにして作成
[
トップ
] [
新規
|
一覧
|
検索
|
最終更新
|
ヘルプ
]
開始行:
Chapter 1
Introduction.
London Cycling Design Standards.
Contents.
1.1 Policy context.
1.2 Responsibilities in relation to cyclists.
1.3 Purpose and use of this document.
1.4 Cycling network - some key concepts.
1.5 LCN+ design principles, standards and checking proced...
1.6 What sort of cyclist are we designing for?.
1.7 Layout of this document.
1.1 Policy context.
National policy.
1.1.1.
The Government's White Paper on Transport1 published in J...
At the forefront of this policy was the promotion of the ...
Strategy published in 1996, the Minister's foreword to wh...
"On any examination of the needs of a sustainable transpo...
Kingdom for many years. This is especially true when one ...
deliberate action at both local and national level. There...
1.1.2.
The extent to which walking and cycling are more sustaina...
Cycling is the most energyefficient mode of transport gen...
1.1.3.
Cycling also has considerable health benefits. There is i...
"The way we travel is making us a less healthy nation. Co...
Energy consumption per person kcal/km.
Bicycle 4 mph.
Bicycle 10 mph.
Bicycle 15 mph.
Walk 4 mph.
Car with two occupants 30mpg
8.4
15.6
24.4
55.3
410
Introduction
1 A new deal for Transport:
better for everyone
– DETR 1998
Figure 1.1
Energy consumption of
cycling, walking and
driving
Source: "Bicycling Science",
Whitt & Wilson, 2nd edition
reprinted 1995, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology Press
1.1.4
Cycling is an inclusive form of transport. Few people can...
Policy in London
1.1.5
The Mayor's Transport Strategy (GLA 2001) sets out a fram...
1.1.6
The Mayor's Transport Strategy committed increased resour...
1.1.7
The development of standards and procedures for designing...
1.1.8
The level of cycling in London is low, compared to other ...
1.1.9
The casualty statistics for the 3-year period 2001-2003 s...
1.1.10
There is considerable scope for change. Londoners own aro...
Market research shows that at least 10% of Londoners woul...
1.1.11
Also, recorded injuries of all severities to cyclists in ...
1.1.12
London's cycling environment is complex and dynamic. The ...
quality, resulting occasionally in situations where those...
1.1.13
There is a division of responsibility for London's networ...
1.1.14
The tool-kit for creating good conditions for cycling is ...
1.1.15
Schemes are likely to be successful if they help cyclists...
1.1.16
TfL recognises that the vitality of London's streets is a...
1.1.17
TfL's own research5 into the impact of different cycling ...
1.1.18
Measures to manage the volume and speed of motor traffic ...
1.1.19
Guidance given by TfL to boroughs preparing Local Impleme...
1.1.20
Under normal circumstances shared-use cycling on the foot...
1.1.21
London cyclists themselves highlight three key requiremen...
• uninterrupted routes i.e. no loss of priority, no...
• improved maintenance i.e. a good riding surface.
• more dedicated cycle facilities e.g. cycle lanes ...
1.1.22
There are some common situations that are inherently prob...
These include:
• Large roundabouts (two or more circulating lanes).
• Uncontrolled fast moving left filter lanes.
• Banned movements without cyclists exemption.
• Road closures without cycling gaps.
• Interrupted or obstructed lanes.
• "Cyclists Dismount" signs.
• Counter intuitive loss of priority (at side roads).
• One-way streets without cyclists' exemption.
1.1.23
Schemes will make a positive contribution to cycling obje...
1.1.24
TfL's aim is to stimulate and apply and maintain consiste...
1.1.25
In order to achieve these conditions, improved co-ordinat...
終了行:
Chapter 1
Introduction.
London Cycling Design Standards.
Contents.
1.1 Policy context.
1.2 Responsibilities in relation to cyclists.
1.3 Purpose and use of this document.
1.4 Cycling network - some key concepts.
1.5 LCN+ design principles, standards and checking proced...
1.6 What sort of cyclist are we designing for?.
1.7 Layout of this document.
1.1 Policy context.
National policy.
1.1.1.
The Government's White Paper on Transport1 published in J...
At the forefront of this policy was the promotion of the ...
Strategy published in 1996, the Minister's foreword to wh...
"On any examination of the needs of a sustainable transpo...
Kingdom for many years. This is especially true when one ...
deliberate action at both local and national level. There...
1.1.2.
The extent to which walking and cycling are more sustaina...
Cycling is the most energyefficient mode of transport gen...
1.1.3.
Cycling also has considerable health benefits. There is i...
"The way we travel is making us a less healthy nation. Co...
Energy consumption per person kcal/km.
Bicycle 4 mph.
Bicycle 10 mph.
Bicycle 15 mph.
Walk 4 mph.
Car with two occupants 30mpg
8.4
15.6
24.4
55.3
410
Introduction
1 A new deal for Transport:
better for everyone
– DETR 1998
Figure 1.1
Energy consumption of
cycling, walking and
driving
Source: "Bicycling Science",
Whitt & Wilson, 2nd edition
reprinted 1995, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology Press
1.1.4
Cycling is an inclusive form of transport. Few people can...
Policy in London
1.1.5
The Mayor's Transport Strategy (GLA 2001) sets out a fram...
1.1.6
The Mayor's Transport Strategy committed increased resour...
1.1.7
The development of standards and procedures for designing...
1.1.8
The level of cycling in London is low, compared to other ...
1.1.9
The casualty statistics for the 3-year period 2001-2003 s...
1.1.10
There is considerable scope for change. Londoners own aro...
Market research shows that at least 10% of Londoners woul...
1.1.11
Also, recorded injuries of all severities to cyclists in ...
1.1.12
London's cycling environment is complex and dynamic. The ...
quality, resulting occasionally in situations where those...
1.1.13
There is a division of responsibility for London's networ...
1.1.14
The tool-kit for creating good conditions for cycling is ...
1.1.15
Schemes are likely to be successful if they help cyclists...
1.1.16
TfL recognises that the vitality of London's streets is a...
1.1.17
TfL's own research5 into the impact of different cycling ...
1.1.18
Measures to manage the volume and speed of motor traffic ...
1.1.19
Guidance given by TfL to boroughs preparing Local Impleme...
1.1.20
Under normal circumstances shared-use cycling on the foot...
1.1.21
London cyclists themselves highlight three key requiremen...
• uninterrupted routes i.e. no loss of priority, no...
• improved maintenance i.e. a good riding surface.
• more dedicated cycle facilities e.g. cycle lanes ...
1.1.22
There are some common situations that are inherently prob...
These include:
• Large roundabouts (two or more circulating lanes).
• Uncontrolled fast moving left filter lanes.
• Banned movements without cyclists exemption.
• Road closures without cycling gaps.
• Interrupted or obstructed lanes.
• "Cyclists Dismount" signs.
• Counter intuitive loss of priority (at side roads).
• One-way streets without cyclists' exemption.
1.1.23
Schemes will make a positive contribution to cycling obje...
1.1.24
TfL's aim is to stimulate and apply and maintain consiste...
1.1.25
In order to achieve these conditions, improved co-ordinat...
ページ名:
![[PukiWiki]](image/pukiwiki.png "[PukiWiki]")
